Solutions

KYB data from the actual registries.

Know-your-business checks are only as good as the registry data behind them. Recordpipe builds compliance datasets straight from public sources — secretary-of-state registrations, UCC filings, licensing boards, published sanction and exclusion lists — normalized into one schema your onboarding and monitoring flows can actually use.

What we deliver

Business registration data

Formation records, status, officers, and registered agents across all the states you onboard from.

UCC filing data

Lien and security-interest filings, structured for exposure and diligence checks.

License status monitoring

Regulated counterparties re-checked on cadence, with webhook alerts on status changes.

Published sanction and exclusion lists

Public lists your team checks manually, delivered as one refreshed, structured feed.

A KYB data provider that starts at the registry, not a cached copy

Most KYB failures trace to the same root: the vendor's database said one thing, the registry said another, and nobody checked the registry. A KYB data provider should be judged on how close its data sits to the public record it claims to represent.

Recordpipe builds compliance datasets directly from public sources and tells you when each record was captured. Entity name, status, formation details, officers, and registered agents arrive normalized into a single schema across every jurisdiction you onboard from — so your flow runs the same logic whether the applicant formed in one state or another, and your audit trail shows exactly what the public record said at decision time. That capture-time provenance matters when a regulator, auditor, or internal review asks why an entity passed onboarding: the answer is a record with a timestamp, not a vendor's shrug.

UCC filing data for exposure, diligence, and lending decisions

UCC filing data answers questions registries alone can't: who already holds a secured position against this business, what collateral is encumbered, and whether the clean balance sheet in the application matches the lien record in the public file.

Recordpipe delivers UCC filings structured for machines rather than clerks — debtor and secured-party names as filed, collateral descriptions, filing status, and amendments and terminations connected to their original filings so your team sees current position, not a pile of disconnected documents. Commercial lenders run it pre-funding. Diligence teams run it against acquisition targets. Credit teams monitor it for new filings against existing borrowers, because a new secured creditor appearing mid-relationship is exactly the kind of signal a periodic review misses. Delivered as bulk files for portfolio-wide analysis or as lookups inside your underwriting flow.

Monitoring the back book, not just the front door

Onboarding checks are where compliance programs start; back-book decay is where they get hurt. Entities dissolve, licenses lapse, officers change, and published exclusion lists update — while the file your program relies on stays frozen at approval.

Recordpipe runs continuous monitoring as a service. Your counterparty population is re-checked against refreshed registrations, license statuses, UCC filing activity, and published sanction and exclusion lists on a contracted cadence, and your systems receive deltas: which entities changed, what field, from what value to what value, captured when. The pipelines behind this already process over one million public records nightly for our own products, so monitoring a large institution's counterparty base is configuration, not a build-out. Compliance teams stop re-underwriting the whole book on a calendar and start responding to actual changes as they surface.

Delivery that fits a regulated stack

Regulated buyers have delivery constraints most data vendors treat as afterthoughts. Recordpipe treats them as the spec: a hosted API with keys and documentation for onboarding flows, scheduled file drops for batch reconciliation, output in your field names and formats, and documentation of sources and capture methodology your audit function can file.

The commercial shape is deliberately plain. A $500 scoping returns feasibility, a sample, and an exact fixed price within 5 business days. Contracts run from $5,000 for a focused registry build to $3 million for multi-jurisdiction programs with continuous monitoring. And the compliance boundary stays explicit: Recordpipe delivers raw public data, not consumer reports; we are not a consumer reporting agency; your compliance function owns the decisions. Use cases that could touch eligibility get a compliance review at intake — we would rather lose a deal than blur that line.

What a delivery looks like

FieldDescription
legal_nameEntity legal name as registered, plus normalized name for matching
entity_statusRegistration status (active, dissolved, delinquent, merged) as published
formationJurisdiction of formation and formation date from the public record
officersOfficers and directors as filed, where the jurisdiction publishes them
registered_agentRegistered agent name and address as filed
ucc_filingsLinked UCC records: secured party, debtor as filed, collateral summary, filing status
license_statusStatus of applicable public licenses for regulated counterparties
list_matchesMatch results against published sanction and exclusion lists in scope
change_deltaFor monitored entities: field changed, prior value, new value
capture_tsTimestamp of record capture — the provenance line your audit trail cites
How teams use it

In the field.

Merchant onboarding at a payments company

A payments compliance team can wire registry verification into its onboarding API: applicant identity matched against formation records and status at decision time, with the capture timestamp stored alongside the approval. When an auditor samples the file, the evidence is the public record as it stood, not a vendor attestation.

Pre-funding lien checks at a commercial lender

A lender's credit team can run structured UCC filing data against every applicant before funding — existing secured parties, collateral already encumbered, amendments and terminations resolved to current position — and keep funded borrowers on a monitoring feed that flags new filings mid-relationship.

Back-book remediation at a fintech

A fintech that onboarded fast and now faces a remediation program can re-verify its entire customer base in bulk against current registrations and published exclusion lists, then keep the book on cadence monitoring — converting a painful audit finding into a running control.

Vendor risk at a regulated enterprise

A procurement and third-party-risk team can screen its supplier base against registration status, license standing, and published exclusion lists on a scheduled cadence, receiving only the deltas — the handful of vendors whose public record actually changed since last cycle.

Business verification data, commercial lending data, due diligence data: onboarding checks plus continuous monitoring

The same dataset that powers your point-of-onboarding API re-verifies your back book on a nightly or weekly cadence. Fixed-price contracts from $5,000 to $3 million depending on registries, volume, and cadence.

Can our developers get this as an API?
Yes — a hosted API with keys and documentation is a standard delivery, supported by us, and it can run alongside scheduled batch files against the same underlying dataset; see the Data API page.
Is this a compliance decision tool?
No. Recordpipe delivers the raw public data; your compliance function owns the decisions and the regulatory obligations. We are not a consumer reporting agency, our deliverables are not consumer reports, and eligibility-adjacent use cases get a compliance review at intake.
How is this different from an off-the-shelf KYB API?
Off-the-shelf products sell you their coverage, in their schema, at their refresh rate. Recordpipe builds to your jurisdictions, your fields, and your cadence — and every record carries its own capture timestamp.
Which registries and lists do you cover?
Whatever is publicly published in the jurisdictions you name. List them in the intake form; the $500 scoping returns per-jurisdiction feasibility, a sample, and a fixed price within 5 business days.
How fresh is the data?
Cadence is contractual and set to how each source publishes. The infrastructure already processes over one million public records nightly, so the constraint is what the source publishes, not what we can collect.
Do you provide beneficial ownership data?
We deliver what the public record publishes — officers, registered agents, and filings as filed. Where ownership information is not publicly published, we say so at scoping rather than filling gaps with inference.
What does a program cost?
Fixed-price after scoping: from $5,000 for a focused build to $3 million at the top of our published range for multi-jurisdiction programs with continuous monitoring.